The Great Website Experiment

17 Sep

Needlessly organised into sections relating to famous songs

Website ch ch ch ch changes

So we needed a new website. We created a site architecture based on our services and personalities; developed a tone of voice and content that would appeal to our broad potential customer-base; decided which on-page elements would entice our visitors to get in touch; and smothered it all with a healthy peppering of branding.

But then we needed somewhere to stick it all.

So we thought we’d dress our inherent thriftiness up as “The Great Website Experiment” and see if we couldn’t rustle up our very own conversion engine for as little money as possible. The answer; a web hosting company that allows you to build your own website, when you’ve limited technical-development ability. After all, we don’t code and build digital channels, we market them!

We decided on the platform Moonfruit (as the name alone sent us into a collective reverie about leguminous space travel). For as little as the hosting costs, you can pick a pre-existing template based on your industry, or start with a blank template and let your creative juices run free – which is what we did.

Can’t buy me love…

Cost is the main pro. Don’t get me wrong, a good developer is always worth their salt and can assess your needs and create a design with flexible templates to suit you. However, we want to let people know what we do and provoke a contact. Simple?

Another benefit; you can bring to life your own concepts and it quickly becomes apparent whether or not it can be done. If you want a great big arrow that nonchalantly slides under your top navigation and then shamelessly points at your contact details, you can have one with the flick of a mouse:


Text and title boxes are easily created and positioned. You can move panels and images around at will and throw in more shapes than a drunken dad at a wedding. The problems with creating multiple templates are a thing of the past – you could create a different template for every page if you had the time (and patience).

navajo new

It’s not all plain sailing however… the CMS interface is a tad awkward at times and it’s difficult to make multiple changes to all pages if they’re different sizes e.g. we had to add the footer to each page individually.

I can see clearly now…

What about improving our website visibility? The platform prides itself on being SEO friendly (as does popular competitor 1 & 1) and even provides a handy guide for beginners. SEO benefits include:

• Automatic creation of an xml sitemap.
• Easy creation of robots.txt.
• Connect Google Analytics, Webmaster Tools and Adsense accounts.
• Add metadata including title, keywords (if you’re into that sort of thing) and meta description.
• Add alt tags to images and titles to anchor text.
• Determine which headings are H1, H2 etc.
• Easily add in social share buttons.


The page load speed could be faster, couldn’t it? We’re working on this. Google have stated it is an SEO factor. We are working to improve the page load times, e.g. correct ordering of style sheets, compressing of images.

A song about usability issues (I can’t think of one)

When pages are loaded in Chrome or Firefox, they sometimes do what can technically only be described as “a weird squashy thing” as the page loads – not a major issue as it lasts for half a second, but not ideal.

The URLs are a little on the messy side. Take for example the page while it’s great that we’ve got the name / theme of the page into the URL, the numbers are a bit ugly. Fortunately, the link takes you to the same page, which begs the question why couldn’t we have used this in the first place? So when you want to share a page with all of your friends, you can use{page name} and you’ll get there.

Video killed the radio star…

Videos play in all browsers except for Google Chrome, but we never liked Chrome anyway.

What’s that coming over the hill?

Whatever it is (coming over the hill), make sure you don’t adjust your view. There’s a slight issue with zooming in and out. If your browser view is set to anything other than 100% then the site may look mangled… again we’re told that this will be developed. In the mean time don’t adjust your screens!



while there is an option to add a Google search box, this looks a bit clunky. We always recommend a site search function with larger sites, however we’ve attempted to organise content with enough sign-posts to make it easy for visitors to find information.

Let us know if there is anything we’ve missed or you have any feed-back. Developers, what would you have changed? Can anyone think of a song about usability issues?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: